Conflict Handling Test result

Competing: you hold your ground

Want to understand yourself more deeply?

Download the Lovon app

Your result is a starting point: talking it through with Lovon, your AI relationship coach, is where it gets specific.

What this means

Your answers lean toward pressing your own case and away from making room for the other side. In a disagreement you say plainly what you want, keep making your argument until the other person comes around, and stick with your decisions when someone pushes back. You are less likely to ask what matters most to them, or to check they are all right with how it ended.

In the classic five-style picture of conflict handling, that is competing: high concern for your own outcome, lower concern for theirs. It is a strategy, not a personality flaw, and it has real uses.

Where competing works

Some disagreements need someone to hold a line. In an emergency, on a question of safety or ethics, or when a decision is genuinely yours to make and you have the most information, pressing your case is the right call. People who compete well are often the ones who stop a bad idea before it costs anyone.

Where it costs

Used as a default, it wins arguments and loses cooperation. People who regularly lose to you stop bringing you their views, or agree in the room and drag their feet afterwards. At home, a partner who always ends up giving way can quietly store it up, and the cost shows up later as resentment or distance rather than as an argument you can see.

The other risk is information. When you push hard early, you often never hear the one fact that would have changed your mind.

What to do next

Ask one question before you argue. "What matters most to you about this?" takes ten seconds and often shows that you want compatible things.

Sort your disagreements. Decide in advance which issues are genuinely worth winning, and give way on purpose on the ones that matter more to the other person than to you.

After a disagreement you won, check in: "Are you OK with how that ended?" If the answer is a flat yes, ask again later.

Try the collaborative version once this week. On one decision that matters to both of you, lay out both sets of concerns before you argue for your own. You may still get your way, with less cost.

If your disagreements at home also get heated, the conflict style test looks at escalation, avoidance and repair, which this test does not.

Before your next important disagreement, Lovon can help you work out what the other side actually needs.

This quiz is for self-reflection and educational purposes. It is not a diagnosis, clinical instrument, or replacement for professional care. If any of this raises concerns, consider talking to a licensed therapist. How we build these quizzes.

Want to understand yourself more deeply?

Download the Lovon app

Your result is a starting point: talking it through with Lovon, your AI relationship coach, is where it gets specific.

Free tools

Articles

From the wiki

The twelve items on this test are written by Lovon around the two-concern model of conflict handling described above. It is not the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument or any other published conflict assessment, and it does not reproduce their items or scoring.

There are no norms behind the results. The cut-offs are points for reading your own answers back, not percentiles, and nothing here is a diagnosis or a hiring assessment.

Disagreements over decisions are not the same as conflict that involves threats, intimidation or fear. If a relationship feels unsafe, that needs support rather than a different conflict style.